Authoritative record
An agency or local-government record such as a parcel service, zoning ordinance or effective FEMA layer.
Methods, evidence & limitations
Landery combines authoritative public data, automated spatial analysis and documented local requirements to produce a preliminary land due-diligence assessment. It deliberately limits its claims.
In the technical method below, program-sized means the requested home, septic reserve, well, accessory building, yard and access are drawn at the dimensions supplied by the user.
Landery does not establish survey boundaries, title rights, legal frontage, jurisdictional wetlands, septic suitability, well yield, engineered grades, structural feasibility, utility capacity, environmental liability, market value or permit approval. A drawn concept is never presented as a guaranteed building site.
Top-level status is restricted to Preliminary opportunity, Material constraints or Insufficient data. Confidence describes the completeness, agreement and freshness of the evidence—not approval likelihood. Landery does not publish a consumer-facing “buildability score”; ranked possibilities are explained through program fit, conflicts, access, uncertainty and next actions.
Landery combines authoritative public data, automated spatial analysis and documented local requirements to produce a preliminary land due-diligence assessment. The underlying analytical methods are proprietary.
Before an analysis is marked complete, Landery checks that the required evidence is available and internally consistent, the requested plan has been evaluated against supported data and local requirements, and the report’s findings, maps and limitations agree. If those standards cannot be met, the analysis is blocked or reports insufficient data.
Landery reports are generated by software. They are not individually prepared, reviewed or approved by an engineer, surveyor, environmental consultant, zoning official, attorney or human land-use analyst.
An agency or local-government record such as a parcel service, zoning ordinance or effective FEMA layer.
A published GIS layer useful for early screening but not a field or legal determination.
An acreage, distance, slope, overlap or contiguous-area calculation produced from mapped evidence.
A rules-based conclusion, conflict flag or comparison generated from the available evidence and requested program.
An editable planning idea—such as a home, septic reserve, driveway or easement corridor—that is not surveyed, engineered or approved.
A controlling survey, title review, soil evaluation, wetland delineation, engineering design or agency determination still required.
The private beta currently has release-supported coverage for Grattan, Ada, Cannon, Vergennes, Lowell, Alpine, Byron and Plainfield townships in Kent County, Michigan. Courtland and Solon currently have parcel-specific acceptance coverage only; unsupported parcels there are blocked. Preflight may still block any property if its zoning district, required source or imagery vintage cannot be verified. Other Michigan counties and the continental United States are future coverage goals, not current claims.
Parcel identity is checked fresh for each new analysis. Supporting layers may use a labeled snapshot last verified within 30 days when the agency source and effective or acquisition date are known. Local rulesets become ineligible for a full report when their verification window expires. A saved report remains tied to its original manifest; refreshing evidence creates a new analysis run.
Automation cannot independently confirm exact legal boundaries, official wetland boundaries, septic or well approval, legal access, clear title, utility availability, zoning or variance approval, permit eligibility, final engineering feasibility, construction cost or a professional environmental conclusion. Landery flags the applicable verification step instead of presenting an automated screen as that determination.
Landery uses automated spatial analysis and rules-based screening to generate findings and next-step explanations. The software does not replace cited public records or professional verification, and its outputs are not professional opinions. Uploaded legal and technical documents are private references and are not automatically interpreted in the current beta.
This is a preliminary planning analysis based on publicly available GIS and mapping data. It is not a boundary or topographic survey, engineering design, legal determination, title opinion, zoning approval, septic or well approval, permit decision, environmental site assessment or official wetland delineation. Public GIS layers have positional, classification and temporal limitations. Field investigation and agency determinations control.